Residence Policy Index · Issue No 1 · August 2026

Jordan

Path to citizenship scores 7 out of 100: the law simply has no permanent residence.

93place of 97
43out of 100
DLeague
88-95place interval
Place among 97

Jordan on the common scale

433050658090
Each tick is a country, all 97 on one scale. The bands are leagues, the bold tick is Jordan

The place interval 88-95 shows where the country lands when the data is nudged and the index is recalculated. One place of difference in the table means nothing; a difference of a league means something.

League DYou are a guest herebelow 50 pointsThe state is not building you a future and, to its credit, usually does not hide it. You can come and work; you cannot count on permanent status, full family rights or protection when you lose your job.
What the score is made of

Seven categories

Agency processing45
Pressure on newcomers53
Status security31
Access to entry49
Path to citizenship7
Family rights52
Settling in62

The thin mark on each bar is the average across 97 countries

The strongest category here is Settling in: 62 out of 100, against a 97-state average of 69.5. The weakest is Path to citizenship: 7 against 57.1. Above the world average: 0 out of 7.

The close-up

What sits behind the score of Jordan

Law 24/1973 does not know permanent residence. The most it provides is that, after ten years of lawful residence, the minister may issue a five-year renewable residence permit. That is a renewable status, not a permanent one, and the decision is theirs to make.

The law gives no grace period after dismissal at all: the employer must notify the authorities within 48 hours and the status ends. You can change employer only with their permission, and anyone who resigns loses their legal standing. The GLOBALCIT report describes citizenship with the formula «many options in the law, few in practice».

UpsideThe employment route has no income threshold, the employer sponsors you, and the family is processed together with the sponsor: the main applicant's permit covers spouse and children at the same time.

Where the index stops answering

This score was not calculated about you

All 97 states are calculated for one applicant: 35 years old, income of $2,500 and $3,856 a month before tax, passport not counted, the most accessible route that is actually in use.

Your passport, your income and your family do not change the table. They change which of its lines apply to you. A different income makes entry read differently, a family makes the family category read differently, and your passport makes everything read differently.

Nearby in the table

Neighbours by place

How this is calculated

Method and sources

97 states, 26 indicators, seven categories, 2,522 scores. Every score has a source and a source class: primary means the texts of laws and government portals; reliable secondary means reports by international organisations, tax reviews by audit firms and specialist legal publications; weak means community posts and single secondary sources. The classes add up to a confidence level for the country, and a country with low confidence gets neither a score nor a place.

Every indicator is scored against a fixed ruler, not against its neighbours. Adding new countries therefore does not move the old ones, and a change in a score means a change in policy and nothing else.

A high place does not mean a good country. It means one thing: the state machine treats newcomers predictably and by the rules. Living there may be expensive, dull or hot; that is not our question.

We make mistakes and we will go on making them: policy changes faster than any database. Our answer is not a pose of infallibility but a visible trail of corrections. Every correction is published: what it was, what it became, the source and the reason for the error. The corrections log opens with the second issue, together with the first block of changes.