Residence Policy Index · Issue No 1 · August 2026

Ghana

The law explicitly requires a renewal with the same employer to be treated as a new application.

88place of 97
47out of 100
DLeague
80-91place interval
Place among 97

Ghana on the common scale

473050658090
Each tick is a country, all 97 on one scale. The bands are leagues, the bold tick is Ghana

The place interval 80-91 shows where the country lands when the data is nudged and the index is recalculated. One place of difference in the table means nothing; a difference of a league means something.

League DYou are a guest herebelow 50 pointsThe state is not building you a future and, to its credit, usually does not hide it. You can come and work; you cannot count on permanent status, full family rights or protection when you lose your job.
What the score is made of

Seven categories

Agency processing37
Pressure on newcomers48
Status security38
Access to entry42
Path to citizenship53
Family rights60
Settling in62

The thin mark on each bar is the average across 97 countries

The strongest category here is Settling in: 62 out of 100, against a 97-state average of 69.5. The weakest is Agency processing: 37 against 48.7. Above the world average: 0 out of 7.

The close-up

What sits behind the score of Ghana

Immigration Act 573, section 23(2): even an annual renewal with the very same employer is treated as a new application. Stable status does not exist here by the design of the law itself. There is no grace period after dismissal: the law obliges the employer to carry out the director's instruction to repatriate the worker and their dependants. Dependants receive residence, but entering the labour market on it is not allowed, and the wording in the law is explicit. How many foreigners a company may hire depends on the volume of the employer's foreign capital: that is a restriction on hiring, not a way to attract people.

PressureOn 3 December 2025, more than 200 foreign-owned shops in Kumasi were closed without warning.

Where the index stops answering

This score was not calculated about you

All 97 states are calculated for one applicant: 35 years old, income of $2,500 and $3,856 a month before tax, passport not counted, the most accessible route that is actually in use.

Your passport, your income and your family do not change the table. They change which of its lines apply to you. A different income makes entry read differently, a family makes the family category read differently, and your passport makes everything read differently.

Nearby in the table

Neighbours by place

How this is calculated

Method and sources

97 states, 26 indicators, seven categories, 2,522 scores. Every score has a source and a source class: primary means the texts of laws and government portals; reliable secondary means reports by international organisations, tax reviews by audit firms and specialist legal publications; weak means community posts and single secondary sources. The classes add up to a confidence level for the country, and a country with low confidence gets neither a score nor a place.

Every indicator is scored against a fixed ruler, not against its neighbours. Adding new countries therefore does not move the old ones, and a change in a score means a change in policy and nothing else.

A high place does not mean a good country. It means one thing: the state machine treats newcomers predictably and by the rules. Living there may be expensive, dull or hot; that is not our question.

We make mistakes and we will go on making them: policy changes faster than any database. Our answer is not a pose of infallibility but a visible trail of corrections. Every correction is published: what it was, what it became, the source and the reason for the error. The corrections log opens with the second issue, together with the first block of changes.