Residence Policy Index · Issue No 1 · August 2026

Brazil

One of two countries with 100 out of 100 for status security: an appeal halts removal by an explicit provision of the law.

between leagues
7place of 97
80out of 100
ALeague
4-10place interval
Place among 97

Brazil on the common scale

803050658090
Each tick is a country, all 97 on one scale. The bands are leagues, the bold tick is Brazil

The place interval 4-10 shows where the country lands when the data is nudged and the index is recalculated. One place of difference in the table means nothing; a difference of a league means something.

League AThey keep their word80 points and aboveThe rules are written, they are followed and they do not change retroactively. A mistake costs you nerves here, not your life: if something goes wrong you will have a deadline, a legal provision and a procedure you can follow.

Between leaguesThe league holds in fewer than half of the recalculations. Read this country as sitting between two leagues, not as a member of the upper one.

What the score is made of

Seven categories

Agency processing53
Pressure on newcomers92
Status security100
Access to entry80
Path to citizenship87
Family rights92
Settling in62

The thin mark on each bar is the average across 97 countries

The strongest category here is Status security: 100 out of 100, against a 97-state average of 57.9. The weakest is Agency processing: 53 against 48.7. Above the world average: 6 out of 7.

The close-up

What sits behind the score of Brazil

The other such country is Chile. You get at least 60 days, extendable, to put your status in order, freedom of movement is preserved meanwhile, and the law explicitly forbids detention on migration grounds. A spouse works immediately and on equal terms with Brazilians, without a separate permit, and that extends to the family of someone on a remote work visa. Education is a right of everyone under the Constitution, regardless of migration status.

DownsideAgency processing scores 53, settling in 62. Delays in issuing the registration number block both the bank account and payroll; diploma recognition goes through state universities and takes months; income on a remote work visa is taxed at around 24%.

Where the index stops answering

This score was not calculated about you

All 97 states are calculated for one applicant: 35 years old, income of $2,500 and $3,856 a month before tax, passport not counted, the most accessible route that is actually in use.

Your passport, your income and your family do not change the table. They change which of its lines apply to you. A different income makes entry read differently, a family makes the family category read differently, and your passport makes everything read differently.

Nearby in the table

Neighbours by place

How this is calculated

Method and sources

97 states, 26 indicators, seven categories, 2,522 scores. Every score has a source and a source class: primary means the texts of laws and government portals; reliable secondary means reports by international organisations, tax reviews by audit firms and specialist legal publications; weak means community posts and single secondary sources. The classes add up to a confidence level for the country, and a country with low confidence gets neither a score nor a place.

Every indicator is scored against a fixed ruler, not against its neighbours. Adding new countries therefore does not move the old ones, and a change in a score means a change in policy and nothing else.

A high place does not mean a good country. It means one thing: the state machine treats newcomers predictably and by the rules. Living there may be expensive, dull or hot; that is not our question.

We make mistakes and we will go on making them: policy changes faster than any database. Our answer is not a pose of infallibility but a visible trail of corrections. Every correction is published: what it was, what it became, the source and the reason for the error. The corrections log opens with the second issue, together with the first block of changes.